Following the brief but successful era of Amenhotep III's polity, a changing of the guard swept the Near East. Egypt was now ruled by Amenhotep IV. Burna-Buriash II (1395-1371) now seated Babylon's throne as its Kassite king. But it was in 1386 B.C., that the Assyrian king, Ashur-nadin-akhi, departed from this world and was succeeded by Ashur-uballit (1386-1369), triggering a new event. Following his ascension to the throne, Assyria's new ruler quickly marshalled his forces to subdue two newly risen kingdoms on the northern borderlands: Shubari and Musri.
Even the price of a successful military campaign can reach unfathomable heights. The remnants of cuneiform tablets have preserved the letters between Assyria and Egypt, letters in which Ashur-uabllit requested twenty talents of gold from Egypt's pharaoh. This was the precise amount his predecessor had been gifted by Egypt for the reconstruction of their palace and temples a mere decade earlier.
Meanwhile, the king of Babylon, Burna-Buriash II, played his own game, going to great lengths to sweeten relations between the lands of Egypt and his own. He'd already orchestrated his son's marriage to Amenhotep IV's daughter, both staying together in Egypt, to enjoy the lavish lifestyle bestowed upon those within the pharaoh's immediate household. Since his son's union, the king of Babylon continued to make grand gestures, any effort to keep the bind of that friendship taut.
Burna-Buriash II's latest endeavor saw him travel from Babylon to the Nile, in order to present his daughter-in-law a gift. A beautiful necklet of 1048 beads. His reason (or excuse) for personally transporting it was that with so many beads, he trusted no other man with the responsibility of keeping it fully intact for the entirety of the journey. Once he'd arrived to treat with the Egyptian royals, he witnessed the Assyrian messenger's appearance in court to announce his kingdom's request for gold.
The Kassite king of Babylon was significantly displeased. Should the pharaoh of Egypt grant such an extravagant boon, Assyria might then be viewed as the most favored nation in the eyes of the Near East. Many historians have interpreted Burna-Bruiash II's extreme caution as a "jealous fear". In a bitter refusal to simply allow Assyria to gain itself a pre-eminence with Egypt, Babylon protested Assyria's appeal for gold to fund its conquests.
Later, in other letters of cuneiform tablets, the Kassite king wrote to Amenhotep IV, that should Assyria be granted twenty gold talents, then Babylon should be granted twenty gold talents, for at the time his people were building a new temple in their city of Nippur.
We do not know whether Egypt granted either Assyria or Babylon its requests for gold, though there is little evidence to suggest otherwise. Both kingdoms were favored subjects and Egypt was still known to be quite wealthy during this period. The important thing of note is not Egypt's compliances to these demands but to recognize the growing unease and distrust as the lesser kingdoms squabbled to remain the favorite loyalist of Egypt.
The example given demonstrates how an honest request from one large group of people within a border, for gold, might offend another, that has little to nothing to do with such a transaction to begin with.
One might surmise that the attitudes of Egypt's subjects had reduced them to a resemblance of dogs, each vying to outdo the other, in competition for its master's attention.